Understanding the BMR calculator (all formulas) — concept and principle
This calculator estimates basal metabolic rate (BMR), the energy your body uses at complete rest, with six published equations side by side: Mifflin-St Jeor, revised Harris-Benedict, Katch-McArdle, Cunningham, Oxford (Henry) and Schofield. Seeing the spread helps you understand how much the estimate depends on the formula. People planning diets, coaches and dietetics students use it.
How it is calculated
- Mifflin-St Jeor: 10 × W + 6.25 × H − 5 × A + 5 (men) or − 161 (women)
- Harris-Benedict, revised 1984 (men): 88.362 + 13.397 × W + 4.799 × H − 5.677 × A
- Lean body mass LBM = W × (1 − body fat %)
- Katch-McArdle: 370 + 21.6 × LBM; Cunningham: 500 + 22 × LBM
- Oxford (Henry 2005) and Schofield use age bands with weight (and height for Oxford); for men aged 30–60: Oxford 11.4 × W + 541 × H(m) − 137; Schofield 11.472 × W + 873.1
W in kg, H in cm unless stated, A in years; results in kcal a day.
The principle
Most energy at rest goes to keeping organs working, and lean tissue such as muscle and organs uses far more energy than fat. Equations based on weight, height, age and sex approximate lean mass indirectly; Katch-McArdle and Cunningham use lean mass directly, so they need a body fat estimate. The Schofield and Oxford equations were built from large international data sets for WHO/FAO and later updates. Each equation was derived in different groups, which is why they disagree by up to around 10%.
Worked example
Defaults: man, 35 years, 75 kg, 175 cm, 18% body fat.
- Mifflin-St Jeor = 750 + 1,093.75 − 175 + 5 = 1,674 kcal.
- Harris-Benedict = 88.362 + 1,004.78 + 839.83 − 198.70 = 1,734.
- LBM = 75 × 0.82 = 61.5 kg; Katch-McArdle = 370 + 1,328.4 = 1,698; Cunningham = 500 + 1,353 = 1,853.
- Oxford = 11.4 × 75 + 541 × 1.75 − 137 = 1,665; Schofield = 11.472 × 75 + 873.1 = 1,734.
| Height (cm) | Mifflin-St Jeor |
|---|---|
| 43.8 | 853 |
| 87.5 | 1,127 |
| 131 | 1,400 |
| 175 | 1,674 |
| 219 | 1,947 |
| 262 | 2,221 |
| 350 | 2,768 |
How to read the result
Five of the six estimates fall within about 1,665–1,735 kcal; Cunningham is higher because it was designed for active, lean people. Multiply BMR by an activity factor to estimate daily energy needs, then adjust using real changes in weight over a few weeks.
Common mistakes
- Treating BMR as total daily calorie needs.
- Using lean-mass formulas with a guessed body fat percentage.
- Expecting the formulas to agree exactly.
- Ignoring that illness, medicines and hormones change metabolism.
Frequently asked questions
Which BMR formula is the most accurate?
Mifflin-St Jeor is often recommended for most adults, but individual errors of 10% are common with any formula.
What is the difference between BMR and TDEE?
BMR is energy at rest; total daily energy expenditure adds activity and digestion.
Why do formulas give different results?
They were developed from different populations and methods.
Sources: Mifflin MD, St Jeor ST, et al., Am J Clin Nutr 1990;51:241–247 · Roza AM, Shizgal HM, Am J Clin Nutr 1984;40:168–182; Henry CJK, Public Health Nutr 2005;8:1133–1152; Schofield WN, Hum Nutr Clin Nutr 1985;39 Suppl 1:5–41