Understanding the tidal volume calculator — concept and principle
This calculator gives lung-protective tidal volumes for mechanical ventilation, scaled to predicted body weight (PBW) from height and sex. It shows the volume at a chosen target and at 4, 6 and 8 mL/kg PBW as a quick reference for clinicians and students.
How it is calculated
PBW men (kg) = 50 + 0.91 × (height cm − 152.4)
PBW women (kg) = 45.5 + 0.91 × (height cm − 152.4)
Tidal volume (mL) = target mL/kg × PBW
- The usual starting target is 6 mL/kg PBW; protocols allow 4–8 mL/kg.
The principle
Lung size depends on height and sex, not on body weight; a person who gains weight does not grow larger lungs. Using actual weight in heavier patients would over-stretch the lungs. Scaling to PBW gives volumes proportional to real lung size. The ARDS Network trial (2000) found lower mortality with 6 mL/kg PBW than with 12 mL/kg in acute lung injury and ARDS, which made this approach standard.
Worked example
Default inputs: height 170 cm, male, target 6 mL/kg.
- PBW = 50 + 0.91 × (170 − 152.4) = 50 + 16.0 = 66 kg.
- At 6 mL/kg: 6 × 66.0 = 396 mL.
- At 4 mL/kg: 264 mL; at 8 mL/kg: 528 mL.
How to read the result
These volumes are starting points. At the bedside the team adjusts the setting using plateau pressure (kept under 30 cmH₂O), driving pressure, blood gases and the patient's breathing effort. The same height gives the same PBW whatever the patient weighs.
Common mistakes
- Using actual body weight in obese patients.
- Measuring height inaccurately; estimate from ulna or knee height if the patient cannot stand.
- Applying adult formulas to children.
Frequently asked questions
Why 6 mL/kg?
It reduced mortality compared with 12 mL/kg in the ARDS Network trial.
Is lung-protective ventilation used without ARDS?
Many units use 6–8 mL/kg PBW for most ventilated patients.
How is height measured in bed?
With a tape from heel to head, or estimated from ulna length.
Sources: The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network, "Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome", N Engl J Med 2000;342(18):1301–1308