🧮
🧮 Math & statistics

Effect Size Calculator (Cohen’s d, Hedges’ g)

Results update as you type.

Your numbers

Understanding the Cohen's d and Hedges' g effect size — concept and principle

An effect size tells you how large a difference between two group means is, in units that do not depend on the measurement scale. Cohen's d expresses the gap between two means in standard deviations, and Hedges' g is the same quantity with a small-sample bias correction. Researchers report them next to p-values, use them in meta-analyses and plug them into power calculations. Enter each group's mean, standard deviation and sample size.

Cohen’s d as a gap in standard-deviation unitsMeans 105 and 100 with SD 15: the gap of 5 is a third of an SD, so d is about 0.33, a small effect; Hedges g is 0.330.d = the gap measured in SDsmean 2 = 100mean 1 = 105gap 51 SD = 155 ÷ 15 = a third of an SDtinysmallmediumlarge0.20.50.8d = 5 ÷ 15 ≈ 0.33 → smallHedges’ g = 0.333 × 0.990 ≈ 0.330
A 5-point gap with SD 15 is one third of an SD: d ≈ 0.33, a small effect.

How it is calculated

  1. Pooled SD: s_p = √[((n₁ − 1)s₁² + (n₂ − 1)s₂²) ÷ (n₁ + n₂ − 2)].
  2. Cohen's d = (M₁ − M₂) ÷ s_p. The sign shows which group is higher.
  3. Hedges' g = d × (1 − 3 ÷ (4(n₁ + n₂) − 9)), a standard approximation of the exact correction factor.
  4. The size label uses Cohen's benchmarks on |d|: below 0.2 negligible, 0.2 to under 0.5 small, 0.5 to under 0.8 medium, 0.8 or more large.

Means and SDs must be in the same unit; the result itself is unitless.

The principle

A raw difference of 5 points means little on its own: it is huge if scores barely vary and trivial if they vary by 100. Dividing by the pooled SD, a weighted average of the two group variances, puts every study on a common scale. Because the sample SD slightly underestimates the population SD in small samples, d is biased upward; Hedges (1981) derived the correction factor that removes most of this bias. With 40 per group the correction is under 1%, but it matters with fewer than about 20 per group.

Worked example

  1. Group 1: M = 105, SD = 15, n = 40. Group 2: M = 100, SD = 15, n = 40.
  2. Pooled SD = √[(39 × 225 + 39 × 225) ÷ 78] = 15.
  3. d = (105 − 100) ÷ 15 ≈ 0.3333.
  4. Correction factor 1 − 3 ÷ (320 − 9) = 1 − 3 ÷ 311 ≈ 0.99035.
  5. g ≈ 0.3333 × 0.99035 ≈ 0.3301.
  6. |d| lies between 0.2 and 0.5, so the label is small.
How Cohen’s d changes with Mean 1How Cohen’s d changes with Mean 1-5-2.502.557.526.252.578.8105131158210Example: 0.3333333333Mean 1
Each point is the calculator re-run with only “Mean 1” changed; the gold point is the default example. Change the inputs above and this chart follows your numbers.
Mean 1Cohen’s d
26.2-4.916666667
52.5-3.166666667
78.8-1.416666667
1050.3333333333
1312.083333333
1583.833333333
2107.333333333

How to read the result

Where does your result fall?LargeLarge-0.8≥0-0.20.2≥10.8LargeMediumSmallNegligibleSmallMediumLargeYour result: 0.333333 · SmallReference: Cohen's effect-size conventions (0.2 / 0.5 / 0.8)
Where does your result fall?

If both groups are roughly normal, d = 0.33 means about 63% of group 1 scores lie above the mean of group 2 (Φ(0.33) ≈ 0.63). Cohen himself described 0.2, 0.5 and 0.8 as rough conventions for when no better guide exists; in education a d of 0.3 can be meaningful, while in other fields it may be negligible. Compare with effects typically found in your own field. Also remember the uncertainty: with 40 per group the 95% interval for d here runs roughly from −0.11 to 0.77.

Common mistakes

Keep in mind: The pooled SD assumes the two groups have similar variances. If they differ strongly, consider Glass's delta (dividing by the control group's SD) and report which standardiser you used.

Frequently asked questions

Should I report d or g?

Hedges' g is preferred for small samples and in meta-analysis; with large samples the two are practically identical.

Can d be negative?

Yes. A negative value means mean 2 is higher than mean 1; the size depends on the absolute value.

How does d relate to the t statistic?

For two independent groups, d = t × √(1/n₁ + 1/n₂).

Sources: Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. (1988). · Hedges, L. V. (1981). Journal of Educational Statistics, 6(2), 107–128.

Checked 8 Nov 2026. Standard formulas, computed in your browser with double-precision numbers.

🧮 All math & statistics tools →🌍 Calculators by country →