Understanding the qPCR ΔΔCt fold change calculator — concept and principle
The ΔΔCt (comparative Ct) method is the most common way to report relative gene expression from real-time PCR. It compares a target gene with a reference (housekeeping) gene in a treated sample and in a control, and expresses the result as a fold change. This calculator computes ΔΔCt, the fold change and its log₂ value, with an optional amplification efficiency.
How it is calculated
- ΔCt (treated) = Ct target − Ct reference in the treated sample; ΔCt (control) likewise in the control.
- ΔΔCt = ΔCt (treated) − ΔCt (control).
- Fold change = (1 + E)^(−ΔΔCt), where E is efficiency as a fraction (100% → 1, giving the classic 2^(−ΔΔCt)).
- log₂ fold change = −ΔΔCt × log₂(1 + E).
The principle
In the exponential phase each cycle multiplies the product by (1 + E). The Ct is the cycle at which fluorescence crosses a fixed threshold, so a sample with more starting template reaches it sooner: one cycle earlier means about twice as much template at 100% efficiency. Subtracting the reference gene Ct normalises for how much RNA or cDNA went into each well. Subtracting the control ΔCt then expresses the treated sample relative to the control. A lower Ct means more template, hence the minus sign.
Worked example
- Inputs: target 24 and reference 18 (treated); target 26 and reference 18 (control); efficiency 100%.
- ΔCt treated = 24 − 18 = 6; ΔCt control = 26 − 18 = 8.
- ΔΔCt = 6 − 8 = −2.
- Fold change = 2^(−(−2)) = 2² = 4.
- log₂ fold change = 2 × log₂ 2 = 2.
| Target Ct, control | Fold change |
|---|---|
| 6.5 | 0.0000053948 |
| 13 | 0.0004882813 |
| 19.5 | 0.0441941738 |
| 26 | 4 |
| 32.5 | 362.038672 |
| 39 | 32,768 |
| 52 | 268,435,456 |
How to read the result
A fold change of 1 (log₂ = 0) means no difference. Values above 1 indicate up-regulation; values between 0 and 1 indicate down-regulation, for example 0.25 means a four-fold decrease (log₂ = −2). The log₂ scale is symmetric and is usually used for averaging biological replicates and for statistics. Small changes, below about two-fold, need good replication to be convincing, because a 0.5-cycle shift in Ct already corresponds to about 1.4-fold.
Common mistakes
- Swapping treated and control, which inverts the fold change.
- Averaging fold changes directly instead of averaging ΔCt or log₂ values.
- Using a reference gene that the treatment changes.
- Applying 2^(−ΔΔCt) when the target and reference efficiencies differ substantially.
Frequently asked questions
Can I use different efficiencies for the target and reference genes?
Not with this formula, which applies one efficiency to ΔΔCt. The Pfaffl ratio uses E_target^ΔCt(target) ÷ E_ref^ΔCt(ref) for that case.
How many reference genes should I use?
Many studies use two or more validated reference genes and normalise to their geometric mean.
How should I report errors?
Compute standard deviation on ΔCt or ΔΔCt and convert the range afterwards; the resulting fold-change interval is asymmetric.
Sources: Livak, K. J. and Schmittgen, T. D. (2001), Methods 25, 402–408 · Pfaffl, M. W. (2001), Nucleic Acids Research 29, e45 · Bustin, S. A. et al. (2009), Clinical Chemistry 55, 611–622 (MIQE guidelines)